Analyse the way Beatrice and Benedick Essay Example for Free

Analyse the way Beatrice and Benedick Essay The characters Beatrice and Benedick in the William Shakespeare play â€Å"Much Ado About Nothing† can be described as sparring lovers. At the start of the play, it is difficult for them to converse without becoming involved in a â€Å"merry war† or a â€Å"skirmish of wit†. This attitude gradually changes as the play progresses. I shall analyse the way in which this attitude changes as Beatrice and Benedick engage in parlance. From Act One, Scene One, Beatrice demonstrates hypocrisy when to Benedick she says â€Å"I wonder that you will still be talking, Signor Benedick, nobody marks you†. The ironic part of this is that she is actually listening to him. Therefore, as much as she may like to deny it, she is giving the man she â€Å"detests† her undivided attention, and is noticing him. Benedick, in a quick flash of wit answers back â€Å"What, my dear Lady Disdain! Are you yet living? † As Benedick asks Beatrice if she is living, it presents the witty assumption that Benedick has not been aware of Beatrice’s presence. A very well-put reply to this from Beatrice is that â€Å"Disdain† can’t die whilst Benedick is there â€Å"feeding† it to carry on. This battle of wit which occurs between the both of them illustrates the deep loathing that they appear to have for one another. As we shall discover further on in the play, this seems only to be a guise for the immense passion they have for each other. There is, here, however, a suggestion from Beatrice that both of them have had a relationship before: â€Å"You always end with a jade’s trick. I know you of old†. The aforementioned evidence of a possible relationship provides a reason for the skirmish of wit, and also implies there may still be romantic feelings between the two. In Act Two, Scene One, Beatrice is dancing and having a conversation with a masked Benedick. It is not clear, and remains the decision of the reader whether Beatrice truly knows that she is speaking with Benedick. She goes on to describe him as â€Å"the prince’s jester, a very dull fool†. As there is a sense of possession â€Å"the prince’s jester†, it creates the impression that Beatrice sees Benedick as nothing more than a puppet. When speaking with Claudio, Benedick makes it clear he was shocked by this: â€Å"Lady Beatrice should know me, and not know me: the prince’s fool! Hah†¦Ã¢â‚¬  †¦ â€Å"Every word stabs†. Here, Shakespeare has used a dramatic device, ie: the masqued ball, and the inherent identity confusion to make Benedick believe that Beatrice had all along intended to speak ill of him. It is for this reason that I believe that Beatrice knew full well that she was indeed speaking to Benedick. In Act Two, Scene Three, Benedick is successful tricked into thinking that Beatrice is in love with him. However, this trick has not yet been carried out on Beatrice. In the garden, Beatrice approaches Benedick and announces â€Å"I do spy some marks of love in her†. This is ironic because there are none. The passion she shows is one of hate for what she is about to say: â€Å"Against my will I am sent to bid you come in to dinner†. When asked by Benedick if she â€Å"takes pleasure in the message†, she says â€Å"Yea, just so much as you may take upon a knife’s point† (ie: not at all). Benedick has got completely the wrong end of the stick in his soliloquy: â€Å"there’s a double meaning in that†, and thinks that she does not want him to come in, but instead to stay out in the garden with her. Hence, his going inside would not be a pleasurable message for her. However, this is an example of dramatic irony as we know this is not the case at all. Shakespeare points out the truth beneath the characters surface, as well as using language as his tool to juxtapose these feelings, in effect, switching the meaning around so that the connotations are what illuminate the truth. He is also able to use a technique to capture the truth beneath the surface of the characters. Everything that is spoken by the characters seems to have a deeper or double meaning under the words. In Act Four, Scene One, Benedick declares his love for Beatrice. He does this so she will call upon him to right Hero from the terrible injustice that recently occurred at the wedding scene. He asks her if it seems strange that he loves her. This is again an example of dramatic irony, because the audience knows that it’s not strange – she knows already that he loves her. Beatrice, usually extremely able to articulate herself is strangely not able to here. The use of commas and colons break up the following speech, as she is overcome by fierce emotions. She is therefore not able to articulate anything but the fact that she feels sorry for her poor cousin who has been wronged. â€Å"It were as possible for me to say, I loved nothing so well as you, but believe me not, and yet I lie not, I confess nothing, nor I deny nothing. † Beatrice, therefore equivocates here being deliberately ambiguous or unclear in order to mislead or withhold information, ie: her love for Benedick. This is particularly emphasised by the long sentence length. Benedick’s immediate rejection at the idea of killing Claudio â€Å"Not for the wide world! † elicits anger, and impatience in Beatrice who doesn’t wish to converse with Benedick any longer. After much deliberation, knowing it will please Beatrice, Benedick agrees to â€Å"use† his hand â€Å"in some other way than swearing by it†. In other words, he has agreed to engage Claudio in a duel. Beatrice’s reason for wanting him killed is that â€Å"he is now as valiant as Hercules†. This allusion to Hercules implies that Claudio has become too boastful, too big for his boots. In conclusion, it’s clear to see how the attitude between the two changes, and the relationship progresses. Shakespeare employs the use of juxtaposition to mask true feelings. The best illustration of this juxtaposition masking is of the relationship between Beatrice and Benedick. Their incessant banter and wit-battles mask the true feelings each has for the other.

The Art of Hospitality - The Greeks and the Odyssey Essay -- essays re

Each culture treats strangers and guests with distinct differences from every other culture. One of the most hospitable cultures was that of the ancient Greeks, exemplified in Homer’s The Odyssey by both gracious hosts and guests. In Greece and The Odyssey, not only was good hospitality etiquette expected, but the added pressure from the conviction that the gods would punish the host if guests were treated without respect (whether they were poor or rich) further compelled excellent manners. The Odyssey illustrates the proper etiquette when dealing with guests.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Whether friend or stranger, when a guest of any sort arrived the host would greet them and offer them food and drink before any further conversation or engagement of any kind would occur. If the host had considerable wealth, a maid would bring out a basin of water in a â€Å"graceful golden pitcher† to rinse their hands, seen in Book I (line 160) when Athena visits Telemachus, again in Book 4 (60) when Menelaus takes Telemachus and Athena as guests, and also in Book 7 when the King of the Phaeacians greets Odysseus. Appetizers, meats, and wines are all brought out and laid before the guest, as their coming is seen as a celebration, as seen when Telemachus is hosting Athena, â€Å"A staid housekeeper brought on bread to serve them,/appetizers aplenty too, lavishwith her bounty./A carver lifted platters of meat toward them,/meats of every sort†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Book 1, 163-166) On several occasions, a particularly h...

Philosophy- Rationalism and Empiricism Essay

Immanuel Kant found the way to put subjective and objective perspectives together as part of the human transcendental structure. The idea of subjective truth comes from Rene Descartes and his vision on rationalism based on innate ideas that allow people to appreciate what they see in order to reach a conclusion. Secondly, we have John Locke’s idea of objective truth based on a blank state of mind and a phenomenon that allows people to appreciate their reality by relying on experiences with any object, human, place or something else. Descartes and Locke rejected the possibility of bringing these two elements together for a better understanding. Since both focused on what people see through their eyes and their mind process, without considering the importance of the physical nature, Kant argued that they both should work together in order to understand the physical nature of different things. Kant focused on the conscious mental state which explains the importance of both of these elements together. Thomas Nagel highlighted Kant’s perspective and argued that subjective phenomenon’s are linked to single points of view that the objective theory will never be able to abandon. If a person separates them from each other there will be no idea of how something could be true. Since we live in a society with different perspectives, truth is what everyone looks for in order to draw their own conclusions. Nagel argued that having personal experience is enough to have the necessary material for imagination. For example, Nagel offered a metaphor about a bat, in which he suggest the use of imagination to ask ourselves what would be like for us to behave as the bat behaves. It’s clear that Nagel relies on Aristotle’s vision of reality because his realism on subjectivity creates a belief in the existence of facts over the concepts that we create as humans. Although there are facts that people will never comprehend, there is a possibility that through a combination of both people can find the truth of things that they can’t understand. According to Nagel, there is no difference between mental and physical events because there are experiences in which people process things to reach a conclusion. People have the ability to perceive and behave and they both come along together. On the other side, Donald Davidson argued that mental events have physical causes and that we have reason to believe this even though people don’t know if there is a general psychophysical theory. But, what about non-intentional events? Nagel argued that his argument only applies to intentional mental events without considering that as humans have reasons to believe that sensations are physical processes as well. Physical processes don’t have the necessity to look for answers of how something happened. Finally, Kant’s theory argues that our experiences are significant since they can’t be the same because people’s different states of mind, but as human beings it’s important to be subjective to appreciate different phenomenon’s around them. Kant’s made these two perspectives dependent from each other, without leaving any gap in which they both could separate by any chance.

The Theory Of The Victim Mentality Essay - 1602 Words

The victim mentality is an acquired personality characteristic where a person blames others for the challenges in their life, even without clear evidence of such situations. This attitude leads to lack of diversity of ideas by the victims to solve problems or change the situation they are in as they believe it is not their fault and therefore they can do nothing about it. Philosophy helps study the fundamental problems concerning such matters as the reason, language, and issues to resolve such personalities. Through Epistemology, it is easier to understand the nature of knowledge, the belief, and justification of the victims. According to Bertrand Russell, it is through self-examination that people are able to distinguish trustworthy beliefs from untrustworthy or discriminative beliefs. I’ve come to understand that this is an essential part of philosophy to help people who are led to beliefs through invalid inductions. Nothing holds someone back more than seeing themselves as victims; they find little or no chance of improving their lives which make them unhappy, frustrated and angry. Many African Americans believe that they don’t have any role to play in order to improve their life and are angry for not achieving their desired success both educationally and socioeconomically; instead, with the victim mentality, they believe that a strong leader is their only hope which will drastically improve the lives of all black communities and alleviate their educational and social,Show MoreRelatedThe Science of Criminology: Understanding the Mind of a Killer1108 Words   |  5 Pagesprominent members of this theory were Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham† (Crimetheory.com). Beccaria was known as law reformer; transforming the criminal justice system in Euro and indirectly brought it into the United States and rest of the world. On the other end Jeremy Bentham supported Beccaria and shared ideas and common theories about criminology and criminal behaviors, where both agreed that criminal conducts could be understood and well controlled. The classical school theory of criminology basicallyRead MoreThe Second Rape Essay1024 Words   |  5 Pagesrapists tend to blame the victim. There are several factors in which rape victims are being held responsible for the crime and not the rapist. Rape is a crime of sexual violence that can cause â€Å"long-term emotional devastation† in a victim although some victims may respond to it differently (Williams, 16). Victims of this act can also face physical injuries: â€Å"the National Womens Study, funded by the National Institute of Drug Abuse, found that more than 70% of rape victims did not report any physicalRead MoreBehavior, Lack Of Self Control And Behavior982 Words   |  4 Pagesimpulsiveness. According to Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime these two traits contribute criminal and delinquent behaviors. It is through risky behaviors that expose a person to a criminal environment. A person more likely to commit a crime or engage in deviant activity will find themselves in areas that promote that type of behavior, therefore making it more likely a person will be in or be victim to a crime. In theory, even a person who possesses the traits predisposing a personRead MoreWhat Are Five Element s Necessary For Commit Fraud?1739 Words   |  7 Pagespossesses the knowledge that the statement is untrue, (3) the false statement’s intent is to deceive the intended victim, (4) the intended victim justifiably relies on the statement, and (5) the ending result is financial injuries to the intended victim. All false statements do not constitute for fraud; they need to contain a material fact. The materiality of the statement induces the intended victim to agree to something with the defendant. Statements of belief (puffing) are not considered fraudulent sinceRead MoreWhite Collar Crime And Criminal Behavior1534 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout history, many academics have proposed various theories to help comprehend and explain criminal behaviours. These theories investigate many different aspects of the causations of crime and those at risk of criminal behaviour. White collar crime is a term founded less than a century ago within 1939 by Edwin Sutherland. He identified wh ite collar crime as crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation (Hirschi, 1987, pg 953). SutherlandRead MoreCriminal Law And Its Effect On Society951 Words   |  4 Pagestraits carry on as adults. Also males typically have more freedom growing up compare to girls who are more supervised. The increase of female in crime rate is that officers are more willing to arrest females compare to older times. The Liberal feminist theory is the social and political role in women’s society is a factor in their crime rates. The masculinity role in to the crime rate in women the ones who commit crime are not typical they must have a characteristics that makes them male like by physicalRead MoreThe American Dream1504 Words   |  7 Pages 10/18/2012 Ruzich amp; Grant develop a theory around predatory lending and the American Dream that states that â€Å"the use of the metaphor predatory lending has allowed the complex story of the subprime mortgage crisis to be reduced to a simple and dramatic narrative† (Ruzich amp; Grant). They develop that theory in the conclusion of their article Predatory Lending and the Devouring of the American Dream by discussing how theRead MoreThe Public ´s Perceptions of Victims and criminals 895 Words   |  4 PagesAmerica’s Most Wanted have been instrumental for the victims’ rights movement here in America. â€Å"America’s Most Wanted has become one of the most important programs on television, having played a major role in the capture of more than 1,100 fugitives in the U.S. and 30 countries, including 17 on the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted List, rescue of 61 children and Missing persons since its launch in 1988† (Welch, 2013). The host of the show John W alsh was a victim in his own right when his son Adam was taken fromRead MoreHotel Rwanda vs. Erin Brockovich1660 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Hutu feel that they must gain power in order to better their lives. The only way they can do this is to commit a mass genocide against the Tutsi tribes. This event can be seen as a result of Robert Merton’s Anomie theory, or sometimes called strain theory. Merton’s theory â€Å"holds that crime increases – as do other forms of deviance – when the social structure prevents people from achieving culturally defined goals (e.g. Hutu bettering their lives) through legitimate means (e.g. an election)Read MoreThe Problem Of Human Trafficking1439 Words   |  6 Pagesconsequences for society as placing such a hard emphasis on currency allows for an environment that makes it much easier for one to disassociate and place a value on human life. Not to mention the serious trauma and various side effects suffered by the victim s of human trafficking which can range anywhere from headaches and memory problems to anxiety, depression, and even suicide (Mohsen, 2016). If this social problem is not addressed, it will only continue to grow and become even more unmanageable. 2